Bags of Bran

Apologia #3
April 1, 2012, 9:11 pm
Filed under: Apologioi
Curt Ames
Mar 5

to me
His deal was that we were meant to eat the whole fruit- peaches, apples, cherries, everything. Had some sort of misinterpretation of scripture to back it up, too…

Is that the Discovery museum? The place where they confuse concretion with fossilization, and have statues of people riding dinosaurs? And the place they took that cyclops cat head as ‘proof’ that all mutations are deleterious? I’ve got some serious problems with what they’re peddling there, to be honest. No offense meant, but what happens there is… well, not very scientific, and preys on people’s faith and lack of education. It’s possible that the whole thing is quite well-intended, but the end effect is that people come away with less of an understanding of the history of the Earth than when they went in.
Again, not trying to be offensive. I’ve never been there but have seen footage, and have seen individual exhibits thoroughly debunked by sound science.
Do you know if they’re still using the ‘human’ footprints they found in with the dinosaur ones?
Chris Ames
Mar 5

to Curt
Well, there is no such thing as observation without interpretation, but from my world view, concretion is a more likely scenario for much of what is found than fossilization, especially when dealing with poly-strata fossils.The key to science is the scientific method, right? Observation and repeatability. I can visit the Natural History museum and interpret it through a young-earth creationist worldview and disregard the leaps of faith on their signage just as easily as a committed naturalist could visit the Creation Museum and enjoy the high-quality fossils on display and interpret them according to his world-view. The point I was making is that it was a quality museum, not that the interpretation (with which I am largely sympathetic) is binding on everyone who walks through the door.

So, no offense taken. But before you trust selective footage (which is not the same as observation) and an interpretation from a competing worldview, I would suggest making one’s own observations.

All history is interpretation.

I don’t know if anyone is still using the Glen Rose streambeds anymore. Was that a hoax or something?


Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Celebrating Revivalism and Other Noxious Pieties


\"If I am immoderate, I am immoderate to God.\" - Bengel


Like sawdust, but edible.

Broad Meadow

I have spoken the truth coldly; who cares for the truth? To be useful, one must be charming, and my pen has lost that art.

Planting churches with the Baptist Confession in one hand and Tolkien in the other

Orchard Keeper

Plucking fruit from the grove of biblical and theological studies

Jubilate Deo

Music in the service of the church


Theology, apologetics, ramblings

Towards Conservative Christianity

Promoting true conservative Christianity


"Action often eliminates the need for reflection as well as the opportunity." - Antonia Fraser

%d bloggers like this: